Showing posts with label x. Show all posts
Showing posts with label x. Show all posts
Saturday, September 20, 2014
Motorola Moto X Successor Moto X 1 rumored with a Leather back
Motorola Moto X that was a huge success is reportedly going to have a successor, named as Moto X+1. Motorola came back to India with its Moto G as well as the Moto X Android smart phones which gave them a huge success. The company was acquired by Lenovo before which it was owned by Google.
Now the company is rumored to be working Moto X+1 according to the prolific leaker on Twitter, @evleaks.
According to the leaks the successor of the Moto X will be coming with a leather back which was not seen on the Moto X in spite of all its back cover customizations.
This is the first time that we will be seeing a Motorola device with leather back and we all know that the company is well known for trying out different materials for the back of its device.
Earlier Moto X was launched in 2013 in the month of August with a 4.7 inch display with 720 x 1280 pixel resolutions. The device is powered by 1.7 GHz dual core Qualcomm MSM8960Pro Snapdragon processor coupled with 2 G of RAM. More over it will be running on the latest Android 4.4 KitKat Operating System and has a 10 MP shooter at the rear with LED flash and 2 MP sensor on the front.
It also comes with many other interesting features like controlling the device with voice commands or just twist the wrist twice to open the camera and also the flip to silent mode. It also responds to the voice commands just by saying Whats up (upgrade to the Motorola Touchless Control) and all the new notifications will be read out to you.
The specifications and other information’s of the device are not known yet but should be getting all those in the near future from the company. Stay tuned for more information and updates.
Friday, September 5, 2014
Comparison LG Optimus L9 vs HTC Desire X
Comparison: LG Optimus L9 vs HTC Desire X - HTC Desire X and LG Optimus L9 both powered with a dual core processor. HTC Desire X Snapdragon MSM8225 Qualcomm chipset with support for dual-core 1GHz processor, Adreno 203 GPU, and 786MB of RAM. While the LG Optimus L9 use TI OMAP 4430 chipset with support for dual-core Cortex A9 processor 1GHz, PowerVR SGX540 GPU and 1GB of RAM. It is clear that the LG Optimus L9 offers better performance.
Both devices have an internal memory capacity of 4GB plus microSD slot support up to 32GB. LG Optimus L9 and HTC Desire X are both present uses the Android operating system 4.0.4 Ice Cream Sandwich.
LG Optimus L9 has a size larger touch screen. LG Optimus L9 using IPS screen measuring 4.7 inches with a resolution of 540 x 960 pixels (234ppi). While HTC Desire X uses the Super AMOLED screen measuring 4 inches with a resolution of 480 x 800 pixels (233ppi).
HTC Desire X and LG Optimus L9 both equipped with a 5 megapixel rear camera. But the camera LG Optimus L9 more special because it has the ability to record video FullHD 1080. LG Optimus L9 is also equipped with a VGA front camera, while the HTC Desire X is not equipped with a front camera.
For connectivity features, both equipped with features dukunngan 3G HSDPA and HSUPA, Wi-Fi b / g / n, Bluetooth, GPS, and microUSB port.
And for power, HTC Desire X comes with 1650mAh capacity battery, while the LG Optimus L9 comes with a battery capacity of 2150mAh.
HTC Desire X
HTC Desire X is equipped with features like a 5 megapixel camera, 4GB of internal memory plus a microSD slot, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, GPS, and a 1650mAh capacity battery.
LG Optimus L9
LG Optimus L9 smartphone that has a size of 131.9 x 68.2 x 9.1mm and weighs 125 grams is equipped with an application that is able to translate Qtranslator more than 44 different languages using Optical Character Recognition technology.
Monday, September 1, 2014
Best Mobile Game HTC One X or Galaxy S III
Best Mobile Game, HTC One X or Galaxy S III? - Samsung Galaxy S III and HTC One X is included in the ranks of top-tier Android smartphones equipped with quad-core processor with a graphics subsystem capable.
The second screen of this phone was arguably the quality is very good with large size and high resolution.
Both of these make the Galaxy S III and One X is not only ideal for use bermultimedia such as surfing the Internet or watching HD video, but also to play games.
Both processors have the same four CPU cores based on ARM Cortex A9, but the Exynos 4412 and Tegra 3 uses a different GPU unit. Performance of the two smartphones in the running game was different though not contradictory.
Well, between the two flagship Samsung and HTC, which is more reliable to accompany your adventure in your favorite game?
In addition to the processor and the physical, the other point of difference between the Samsung Galaxy S III and HTC One X lies in the size and type of screen used.
With a massive resolution of 1280x720, the display image on the screen is very sharp both the contrast and color saturation.
For another thing, these two smartphones tend to be similar. RAM capacity of 1 GB alike, resolution 8-megapixel camera, and even the physical dimensions and weight of the two only differs marginally.
From the hardware side, the advantages of the Galaxy S III than One X is the support of 4G LTE (for certain markets) as well as storage capacity that can be expanded with a micro SD card up to 64 GB. One X only offers 32 GB of internal storage with no memory slot.
In terms of gaming, micro SD card will certainly help users move large files such as photos or videos to the remaining space in the internal storage that can be filled with gaming applications.
Moreover, game titles modern Android could reach hundreds of megabytes of storage capacity that can be spent quickly.
Overview Technical Specifications
benchmark
To measure the level of game theoretical performance of each smartphone, used two benchmark tests focusing on the graphics, the GLBenchmark 2.5 and RD 3D Benchmark. Here is a brief test results both.
GLBenchmark 2.5
From the hardware side, the advantages of the Galaxy S III than One X is the support of 4G LTE (for certain markets) as well as storage capacity that can be expanded with a micro SD card up to 64 GB. One X only offers 32 GB of internal storage with no memory slot.
In terms of gaming, micro SD card will certainly help users move large files such as photos or videos to the remaining space in the internal storage that can be filled with gaming applications.
Moreover, game titles modern Android could reach hundreds of megabytes of storage capacity that can be spent quickly.
Overview Technical Specifications
benchmark
To measure the level of game theoretical performance of each smartphone, used two benchmark tests focusing on the graphics, the GLBenchmark 2.5 and RD 3D Benchmark. Here is a brief test results both.
GLBenchmark 2.5
RD 3D Benchmark
GPU Mali-400MP GPU on the processor Samsungs Exynos 4412, according to the benchmark, though the graphics have performance that is higher than ULP Geforce 4 +1 cores in the Tegra 3.
So, does this mean that the Samsung Galaxy S III is a smartphone that is superior in the running game? Not really.
Problem Support Title Game
Although slightly behind Exynos 4412 in terms of gaming performance theory, in fact, in most games, the performance of Tegra 3 in HTC One X is very adequate.
The advantages of the Tegra 3 is a developer support applications (game) to the processor on this one. Support or optimization, among other things, allow Tegra 3 display graphical effects are more affluent than other processors.
Like what? Examples can be seen in the game Dead Trigger screenshot below.
Dead Trigger, setting grafis "Ultra High"
Dead Trigger, setting grafis "High"
In the picture above, it appears that the graphics settings "Ultra High" adds a realistic effect of water puddles, complete with sparks that arise when the bullet shot into it. There are also other graphical features such as lighting and smoke better visualization. Visual effects will not be noticeable when the game is run with the graphics settings "High".
Well, setting "Ultra High" in Dead Trigger can only be run on a smartphone with Tegra SoC because this game is designed for NVIDIA processors are homemade. On the Galaxy S III, Dead Trigger refusing to go on a setting higher than "High".
Other game titles too (which is optimized for Tegra) has many similar capabilities, such as Horn, Beach Buggy Blitz, Shadowgun, Riptide GP, Nova 3, and Bladeslinger THD promises console quality gaming graphics class, when run on device Tegra 3.
Graphical display of the Tegra 3 is certainly pretty worthless. The better the game image shown, the more burden borne by the processor and the graphics processor smartphone.
As a result, games can run in broken though not all quite "heavy" to make HTC One X to its knees.
One of the games that could deliver high graphics processing load with prime quality graphic display is First-Person Shooter Nova 3.
Galaxy S III himselfm not able to display graphical effects ciamik. In some cases, such as the Dead Trigger on top, the game can be tricked with file modification that would result in additional visual effects, although not being run by a device with a Tegra processor.
However, it still uses the Tegra 3 is a more practical way to get a better view of the game titles that are optimized for these processors.
Nvidia also provides specialized portal, which Tegrazone, as a means of Tegra device owners to obtain game titles that are optimized for the device.
Conclusion
In terms of gaming, there is no absolute winner between the Samsung Galaxy S III and HTC One X. Each has its own advantages points when used for this one.
The second major difference in terms of mobile gaming may be located on the higher performance offered by the Galaxy S III and beautiful graphics that can be presented HTC One X (in a game optimized for Tegra).
Speed or quality of the display, which is more important? It depends on user preferences and the needs of the game being played. The answer is determined by how much like a smartphone user to see better graphics in the game and to what extent tolerance to the smooth frame rate when playing.
Two phones even this is not the only Android device that can be used to play games. Class models under them were able to run the game in accordance limit the hardware capabilities of each.
However, as you are the products from each manufacturer, presented the experience of playing the Galaxy S III and X One could arguably among the most good for the Android smartphone platform today.
Well, setting "Ultra High" in Dead Trigger can only be run on a smartphone with Tegra SoC because this game is designed for NVIDIA processors are homemade. On the Galaxy S III, Dead Trigger refusing to go on a setting higher than "High".
Other game titles too (which is optimized for Tegra) has many similar capabilities, such as Horn, Beach Buggy Blitz, Shadowgun, Riptide GP, Nova 3, and Bladeslinger THD promises console quality gaming graphics class, when run on device Tegra 3.
Graphical display of the Tegra 3 is certainly pretty worthless. The better the game image shown, the more burden borne by the processor and the graphics processor smartphone.
As a result, games can run in broken though not all quite "heavy" to make HTC One X to its knees.
One of the games that could deliver high graphics processing load with prime quality graphic display is First-Person Shooter Nova 3.
Galaxy S III himselfm not able to display graphical effects ciamik. In some cases, such as the Dead Trigger on top, the game can be tricked with file modification that would result in additional visual effects, although not being run by a device with a Tegra processor.
However, it still uses the Tegra 3 is a more practical way to get a better view of the game titles that are optimized for these processors.
Nvidia also provides specialized portal, which Tegrazone, as a means of Tegra device owners to obtain game titles that are optimized for the device.
Conclusion
In terms of gaming, there is no absolute winner between the Samsung Galaxy S III and HTC One X. Each has its own advantages points when used for this one.
The second major difference in terms of mobile gaming may be located on the higher performance offered by the Galaxy S III and beautiful graphics that can be presented HTC One X (in a game optimized for Tegra).
Speed or quality of the display, which is more important? It depends on user preferences and the needs of the game being played. The answer is determined by how much like a smartphone user to see better graphics in the game and to what extent tolerance to the smooth frame rate when playing.
Two phones even this is not the only Android device that can be used to play games. Class models under them were able to run the game in accordance limit the hardware capabilities of each.
However, as you are the products from each manufacturer, presented the experience of playing the Galaxy S III and X One could arguably among the most good for the Android smartphone platform today.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
